Web Accessibility Lawsuit Trends: The Numbers Behind the Risk
Web accessibility litigation in the US has grown substantially over the past decade, driven primarily by ADA Title III suits against private businesses — a trend worth understanding both as legal risk and as a signal of which specific violations matter most in practice.
The volume trend
Industry data (compiled from federal court filing trackers, most consistently reported by law firms like Seyfarth Shaw that track ADA Title III filings specifically) shows federal web accessibility lawsuit filings exceeding 5,000 per year in recent years, with roughly 37% year-over-year growth reported in some recent tracking periods. The overwhelming majority are filed in a small number of federal districts (New York and California have historically accounted for a large share of filings), and most cases settle rather than proceed to full trial.
These are industry-tracked figures (from litigation trackers, not official government statistics) and change year to year — treat specific numbers as directional evidence of a real, active trend rather than a precise, permanently-fixed count.
Which violations actually get cited
A consistent pattern across tracked litigation and demand letters: a small handful of violation types account for the overwhelming majority of complaints. Industry data commonly cites:
| Violation | Approximate citation rate |
|---|---|
| Missing image alt text | ~89% |
| Missing form labels | ~72% |
| Insufficient color contrast | ~68% |
| Keyboard inaccessibility | ~61% |
| Missing skip navigation | ~55% |
| Empty links/buttons | ~48% |
| Missing page language | ~42% |
See the Common Violations category for a dedicated article on each of these, with concrete fix guidance.
Why these specific issues dominate
Every one of the top violations above is also among the most reliably automatable to detect — see Automated vs Manual Testing. This isn't a coincidence: plaintiffs' firms commonly use automated scanning tools to identify candidate targets before filing, which means the violations easiest for a scanner to catch with zero false positives are also the ones showing up most often in actual litigation. A site free of these specific, mechanically-detectable issues has meaningfully reduced its most common litigation exposure, even though genuine WCAG conformance requires addressing the harder-to-automate criteria too.
Settlement patterns
Reported settlement figures vary widely by case specifics, but industry commentary commonly cites rough figures in the range of $20,000-$50,000 for negotiated out-of-court settlements, with higher figures possible if a case proceeds further toward judgment. Nearly every settlement also includes a remediation commitment — an agreement to meet WCAG 2.0/2.1 AA going forward — meaning the practical, ongoing cost of an accessibility lawsuit is rarely just the settlement figure itself.
This is general information about a broad legal trend, not case-specific legal advice. If you're facing an actual demand letter or lawsuit, consult a lawyer experienced in ADA web accessibility litigation.
Common questions
- How many web accessibility lawsuits are filed each year?
- Industry litigation trackers report federal web accessibility filings exceeding 5,000 per year in recent years, with around 37% year-over-year growth in some periods, concentrated heavily in New York and California.
- Which accessibility violations are cited most in lawsuits?
- Missing image alt text (~89%), missing form labels (~72%), insufficient color contrast (~68%), keyboard inaccessibility (~61%), and missing skip navigation (~55%) are the most commonly cited.
- How much do web accessibility lawsuits settle for?
- Industry commentary commonly cites rough out-of-court settlement figures of 20,000 to 50,000 US dollars, nearly always paired with a commitment to remediate to WCAG 2.0/2.1 AA going forward.
Related articles
Want to see how your own site scores?
Run a free accessibility scan